The 4K numbers are fairly close, as are write figures. Kingston V+200 240GB CrystalDiskMark BenchmarkĪgain, read performance of the Kingston V+200 240GB is below top-end SSD numbers. This is in contrast to the ATTO Benchmark used by LSI/ Sandforce and its partners when they market a given solid state drive. CrystalDiskMarkĬrystalDiskMark is another benchmark which gives non-compressible read/write numbers. The SanDisk Extreme 240GB and its Toggle NAND was able to hit 506MB/s on the sequential read test here. Where the Kingston V+200 240GB falls behind is in the sequential read and 64 thread 4K performance. Here the Kingston V+200 240GB shows fairly decent write performance. The result is perhaps one of the best workstation SSD benchmarks available today. AS SSD BenchmarkĪS SSD is a solid benchmark that does not write compressible data to drives. To this end, AS SSD benchmark, CrystalDiskMark, ATTO, HD Tune Pro and Anvil’s Storage Utilities all show different facets of performance. One should look at a few different tests to get an idea of how the drives perform in different scenarios. It is important, especially with SSDs not to take a single test result at face value. I do think that I will begin using the Intel Z77 chipset in the near future but wanted to provide a baseline using the H67 for the solid state drive reviews. Also, installing the Intel RST 10.xx series drivers over the default Windows 7 drivers showed a nice performance gain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |